MARCH 2026
blinklabs.io Engineering AI Productivity Report
A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the blinklabs.io engineering team.
See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.
The blinklabs.io engineering team reports 91.7% AI adoption, 1.91× productivity lift, and 63.5% code quality across recent work.
These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.
What this report measures
We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.
How to interpret these metrics
Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.
AI Adoption Rate
91.7%
AI assistance is present in 91.7% of recent commits for blinklabs.io.
AI Productivity Lift
1.91×
AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 91% lift in throughput.
AI Code Quality
63.5%
Review insights show 63.5% overall code health on AI-supported changes.
How is the blinklabs.io team performing with AI?
The blinklabs.io engineering team reports 91.7% AI adoption, translating into 1.91× productivity lift while sustaining 63.5% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.
Manager Questions Answered
Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.
See how your full organization compares
Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.
Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.
How Your Company Ranks
See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.
AI Adoption
% of commits with AI assistance
?
Companies in this quartile:
idesie.com
(2904.2%)
inngest.com
(1429.6%)
fmease.dev
(87.5%)
dimagi.com
(87.5%)
Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.
Productivity Lift
Cycle-time improvement vs baseline
?
Companies in this quartile:
inngest.com
(4.82×)
u.nus.edu
(2.87×)
acad.pucrs.br
(1.12×)
mcornholio.ru
(1.12×)
Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.
Code Quality
Post-merge defect rate
?
Companies in this quartile:
inngest.com
(701.7%)
idesie.com
(649.2%)
gzgz.dev
(20.0%)
gwu.edu
(20.0%)
Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.
Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).
Top contributors
Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.
Contributor
Commits
AI Usage
Productivity Lift
Code Quality
Chris Gianelloni
Aurora Gaffney
Ales Verbic
Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.
Cross-Organization Network
Shared Repositories
2Activity
294 CommitsYour Network
3 PeopleWhy these metrics matter for engineering managers
Faster delivery
1.4x lift → predictable roadmaps
Safer velocity
93% quality → lower rollback risk
Equitable gains
AI less dependency on heroes
Governance
Depth monitoring audit-ready
