What's a good company AI adoption rate?
elementor.red is at 93.8%. This is 50.1pp above the community median (43.7%)..
93.8%
↑50.1pp above43.7% Community Median
Keep codifying prompts and monitoring adoption so the lead over peers is sustainable.
MARCH 2026
elementor.red Engineering AI Productivity Report
A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the elementor.red engineering team.
See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.
The elementor.red engineering team reports 93.8% AI adoption, 1.40× productivity lift, and 61.6% code quality across recent work.
These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.
What this report measures
We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.
How to interpret these metrics
Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.
AI Adoption Rate
HIGH
93.8%
AI assistance is present in 93.8% of recent commits for elementor.red.
AI Productivity Lift
MODERATE
1.40×
AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 40% lift in throughput.
AI Code Quality
LOW
61.6%
Review insights show 61.6% overall code health on AI-supported changes.
How is the elementor.red team performing with AI?
The elementor.red engineering team reports 93.8% AI adoption, translating into 1.40× productivity lift while sustaining 61.6% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.
Manager Questions Answered
Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.
Does AI actually make developers faster?
elementor.red operates at 1.40×. This is 0.27× above the community median (1.13×)..
1.40×
↑0.27× above1.13× Community Median
Double down on automation around QA and release prep to compound the gains already in flight.
How does AI affect code quality?
elementor.red holds AI-assisted quality at 61.6%. This is 38.4pp above the community median (23.3%)..
61.6%
Roughly in line23.3% Community Median
Invest in AI-specific test checklists and shadow reviews to keep quality slightly ahead of peers.
How evenly is AI use distributed across our team?
AI impact is concentrated—89.6% of AI commits come from a few experts, raising enablement risk.
89.6%
Run prompt-sharing sessions, codify AI review checklists, and incentivize broad participation.
How can I prove AI ROI to executives?
elementor.red combines strong adoption, lift, and quality control—making the ROI story executive-ready.
—
Link these metrics to deployment frequency and incident cost to convert engineering wins into business KPIs.
See how your full organization compares
Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.
Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.
How Your Company Ranks
See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.
AI Adoption
% of commits with AI assistance
?
Companies in this quartile:
ID
idesie.com
(2904.2%)
IN
inngest.com
(1429.6%)
FM
fmease.dev
(87.5%)
DI
dimagi.com
(87.5%)
Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.
Productivity Lift
Cycle-time improvement vs baseline
?
Companies in this quartile:
IN
inngest.com
(4.82×)
U.
u.nus.edu
(2.87×)
AC
acad.pucrs.br
(1.12×)
MC
mcornholio.ru
(1.12×)
Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.
Code Quality
Post-merge defect rate
?
Companies in this quartile:
IN
inngest.com
(701.7%)
ID
idesie.com
(649.2%)
GZ
gzgz.dev
(20.0%)
GW
gwu.edu
(20.0%)
Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.
Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).
Top contributors
Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.
Contributor
Commits
AI Usage
Productivity Lift
Code Quality
SV
Svitlana-Dykun
Commits85
AI Usage100.0%
Productivity Lift1.88x
Code Quality80.8%
RF
Robert Ferentz
Commits59
AI Usage92.2%
Productivity Lift1.23x
Code Quality64.7%
MA
marcin-elementor
Commits20
AI Usage96.7%
Productivity Lift1.22x
Code Quality92.8%
EA
eavichay-elementor
Commits6
AI Usage79.8%
Productivity Lift1.12x
Code Quality72.7%
MU
MuliElementor
Commits14
AI Usage90.2%
Productivity Lift1.06x
Code Quality20.0%
Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.
Cross-Organization Network
Shared Repositories
2Activity
165 Commits4
8
18
23
34
31
27
20
0
0
0
0
LessMore
Your Network
6 Peopleeavichay-elementor
MemberLorandBE
Membermarcin-el
MemberMuliElementor
MemberRobiFerentz
MemberSvitlana-Dykun
MemberWhy these metrics matter for engineering managers
Faster delivery
1.4x lift → predictable roadmaps
Safer velocity
93% quality → lower rollback risk
Equitable gains
AI less dependency on heroes
Governance
Depth monitoring audit-ready
