MARCH 2026

flamingo.cx Engineering AI Productivity Report

A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the flamingo.cx engineering team.

See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.

The flamingo.cx engineering team reports 94.5% AI adoption, 1.46× productivity lift, and 38.2% code quality across recent work.

These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.

What this report measures

We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.

How to interpret these metrics

Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.

AI Adoption Rate

HIGH

94.5%

AI assistance is present in 94.5% of recent commits for flamingo.cx.

AI Productivity Lift

HIGH

1.46×

AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 46% lift in throughput.

AI Code Quality

LOW

38.2%

Review insights show 38.2% overall code health on AI-supported changes.

How is the flamingo.cx team performing with AI?

The flamingo.cx engineering team reports 94.5% AI adoption, translating into 1.46× productivity lift while sustaining 38.2% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.

Manager Questions Answered

Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.

What's a good company AI adoption rate?

flamingo.cx is at 94.5%. This is 50.8pp above the community median (43.7%)..

94.5%

↑50.8pp above43.7% Community Median

Keep codifying prompts and monitoring adoption so the lead over peers is sustainable.

Does AI actually make developers faster?

flamingo.cx operates at 1.46×. This is 0.33× above the community median (1.13×)..

1.46×

↑0.33× above1.13× Community Median

Double down on automation around QA and release prep to compound the gains already in flight.

How does AI affect code quality?

flamingo.cx holds AI-assisted quality at 38.2%. This is 15.0pp above the community median (23.2%)..

38.2%

Roughly in line23.2% Community Median

Invest in AI-specific test checklists and shadow reviews to keep quality slightly ahead of peers.

How evenly is AI use distributed across our team?

AI impact is concentrated—82.3% of AI commits come from a few experts, raising enablement risk.

82.3%

Run prompt-sharing sessions, codify AI review checklists, and incentivize broad participation.

How can I prove AI ROI to executives?

flamingo.cx combines strong adoption, lift, and quality control—making the ROI story executive-ready.

—

Link these metrics to deployment frequency and incident cost to convert engineering wins into business KPIs.

See how your full organization compares

Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.

Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.

How Your Company Ranks

See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.

AI Adoption

% of commits with AI assistance

Companies in this quartile:

idesie.com

(2904.2%)

inngest.com

(1429.6%)

prefeitura.rio

(87.4%)

naduni.local

(87.4%)

Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.

Productivity Lift

Cycle-time improvement vs baseline

Companies in this quartile:

inngest.com

(4.82×)

u.nus.edu

(2.87×)

acad.pucrs.br

(1.12×)

mcornholio.ru

(1.12×)

Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.

Code Quality

Post-merge defect rate

Companies in this quartile:

inngest.com

(701.7%)

idesie.com

(649.2%)

gzgz.dev

(20.0%)

gwu.edu

(20.0%)

Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.

Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).

Top contributors

Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.

Contributor

Commits

AI Usage

Productivity Lift

Code Quality

Michael Assraf

Commits326

AI Usage96.0%

Productivity Lift2.00x

Code Quality90.0%

Ivan

Commits175

AI Usage92.0%

Productivity Lift1.43x

Code Quality20.0%

aliaska-varieva

Commits50

AI Usage98.0%

Productivity Lift1.22x

Code Quality20.0%

oleksandr-blip

Commits41

AI Usage100.0%

Productivity Lift1.19x

Code Quality20.0%

kirill-567

Commits39

AI Usage98.0%

Productivity Lift1.16x

Code Quality20.0%

Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.

Cross-Organization Network