Exceeds

MARCH 2026

flexion.us Engineering AI Productivity Report

A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the flexion.us engineering team.

See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.

The flexion.us engineering team reports 72.9% AI adoption, 1.22× productivity lift, and 47.0% code quality across recent work.

These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.

What this report measures

We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.

How to interpret these metrics

Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.

AI Adoption Rate

HIGH

72.9%

AI assistance is present in 72.9% of recent commits for flexion.us.

AI Productivity Lift

MODERATE

1.22×

AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 22% lift in throughput.

AI Code Quality

LOW

47.0%

Review insights show 47.0% overall code health on AI-supported changes.

How is the flexion.us team performing with AI?

The flexion.us engineering team reports 72.9% AI adoption, translating into 1.22× productivity lift while sustaining 47.0% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.

Manager Questions Answered

Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.

What's a good company AI adoption rate?

flexion.us is at 72.9%. This is 29.2pp above the community median (43.7%)..

72.9%

Roughly in line43.7% Community Median

Spot squads sitting below the median and pair them with high-adoption champions to share workflows.

Does AI actually make developers faster?

flexion.us operates at 1.22×. This is 0.09× above the community median (1.13×)..

1.22×

Roughly in line1.13× Community Median

Instrument reviewer assignment and AI summaries to trim the slowest merge steps and edge past the median.

How does AI affect code quality?

flexion.us holds AI-assisted quality at 47.0%. This is 23.8pp above the community median (23.3%)..

47.0%

Roughly in line23.3% Community Median

Invest in AI-specific test checklists and shadow reviews to keep quality slightly ahead of peers.

How evenly is AI use distributed across our team?

48.9% of AI commits come from the most active contributors.

48.9%

Pair top AI practitioners with adjacent squads and capture their prompts/playbooks for reuse.

How can I prove AI ROI to executives?

flexion.us has a solid ROI signal with room to strengthen either adoption, lift, or quality before presenting to executives.

Document case studies where AI accelerates delivery while maintaining quality, and expand playbooks across teams.

See how your full organization compares

Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.

Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.

How Your Company Ranks

See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.

AI Adoption

% of commits with AI assistance

Companies in this quartile:

DI

dimagi.com

(87.5%)

PO

postgresql.org

(87.5%)

BL

bloq.com

(21.4%)

DA

daimond113.com

(21.4%)

Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.

Productivity Lift

Cycle-time improvement vs baseline

Companies in this quartile:

IN

inngest.com

(4.82×)

U.

u.nus.edu

(2.87×)

AC

acad.pucrs.br

(1.12×)

MC

mcornholio.ru

(1.12×)

Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.

Code Quality

Post-merge defect rate

Companies in this quartile:

IN

inngest.com

(701.7%)

ID

idesie.com

(649.2%)

GZ

gzgz.dev

(20.0%)

GW

gwu.edu

(20.0%)

Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.

Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).

Top contributors

Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.

CB

Christopher Bisom

Commits721
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift2.00x
Code Quality100.0%
FM

Fritz Madden

Commits379
AI Usage94.0%
Productivity Lift2.00x
Code Quality90.0%
JC

John Cruz

Commits636
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift1.60x
Code Quality20.0%
NE

Nate Elliott

Commits263
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift1.53x
Code Quality55.3%
MS

Matt Sharp

Commits1
AI Usage86.0%
Productivity Lift1.50x
Code Quality20.0%

Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.

Cross-Organization Network

Shared Repositories

9

msharp9

IMJONEZZ/USU-LLM-Class

Unknown contributor

ustaxcourt/website-wagtail

dmvancura

GSA/notifications-admin

weimiao67

No repositories listed

fpigeonjr

No repositories listed

npage123

No repositories listed

Activity

3,164 Commits

Your Network

26 People
amorrow-flexion
Member
A-Shumway42
Member
Mwindo
Member
cseibert113@flexion.us
Member
dmvancura
Member
fmaddenflx
Member
fpigeonjr
Member
jcruz@flexion.us
Member
jorg3lopez
Member

Why these metrics matter for engineering managers

Faster delivery

1.4x lift → predictable roadmaps

Safer velocity

93% quality → lower rollback risk

Equitable gains

AI less dependency on heroes

Governance

Depth monitoring audit-ready

ExceedsExceeds AI

Turns these insights into daily coaching and automatic alerts, helping managers balance speed with sustainability.

See the truth of AI impact

Adoption + lift + quality in one view

Learn more

Know where to act first

Repo and role level "lift potential"

Learn more

Prove ROI

Export executive snapshots and benchmarks

Learn more