What's a good company AI adoption rate?
in.ibm.com is at 88.6%. This is 44.9pp above the community median (43.7%)..
88.6%
↑44.9pp above43.7% Community Median
Keep codifying prompts and monitoring adoption so the lead over peers is sustainable.
MARCH 2026
in.ibm.com Engineering AI Productivity Report
A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the in.ibm.com engineering team.
See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.
The in.ibm.com engineering team reports 88.6% AI adoption, 1.27× productivity lift, and 56.6% code quality across recent work.
These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.
What this report measures
We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.
How to interpret these metrics
Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.
AI Adoption Rate
HIGH
88.6%
AI assistance is present in 88.6% of recent commits for in.ibm.com.
AI Productivity Lift
MODERATE
1.27×
AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 27% lift in throughput.
AI Code Quality
LOW
56.6%
Review insights show 56.6% overall code health on AI-supported changes.
How is the in.ibm.com team performing with AI?
The in.ibm.com engineering team reports 88.6% AI adoption, translating into 1.27× productivity lift while sustaining 56.6% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.
Manager Questions Answered
Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.
Does AI actually make developers faster?
in.ibm.com operates at 1.27×. This is 0.14× above the community median (1.13×)..
1.27×
Roughly in line1.13× Community Median
Instrument reviewer assignment and AI summaries to trim the slowest merge steps and edge past the median.
How does AI affect code quality?
in.ibm.com holds AI-assisted quality at 56.6%. This is 33.4pp above the community median (23.2%)..
56.6%
Roughly in line23.2% Community Median
Invest in AI-specific test checklists and shadow reviews to keep quality slightly ahead of peers.
How evenly is AI use distributed across our team?
49.5% of AI commits come from the most active contributors.
49.5%
Pair top AI practitioners with adjacent squads and capture their prompts/playbooks for reuse.
How can I prove AI ROI to executives?
in.ibm.com has a solid ROI signal with room to strengthen either adoption, lift, or quality before presenting to executives.
—
Document case studies where AI accelerates delivery while maintaining quality, and expand playbooks across teams.
See how your full organization compares
Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.
Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.
How Your Company Ranks
See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.
AI Adoption
% of commits with AI assistance
?
Companies in this quartile:
ID
idesie.com
(2904.2%)
IN
inngest.com
(1429.6%)
PR
prefeitura.rio
(87.4%)
NA
naduni.local
(87.4%)
Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.
Productivity Lift
Cycle-time improvement vs baseline
?
Companies in this quartile:
IN
inngest.com
(4.82×)
U.
u.nus.edu
(2.87×)
AC
acad.pucrs.br
(1.12×)
MC
mcornholio.ru
(1.12×)
Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.
Code Quality
Post-merge defect rate
?
Companies in this quartile:
IN
inngest.com
(701.7%)
ID
idesie.com
(649.2%)
GZ
gzgz.dev
(20.0%)
GW
gwu.edu
(20.0%)
Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.
Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).
Top contributors
Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.
Contributor
Commits
AI Usage
Productivity Lift
Code Quality
RS
Ranjeet Singh
Commits11
AI Usage100.0%
Productivity Lift1.72x
Code Quality20.0%
BH
bhagyak1
Commits43
AI Usage80.0%
Productivity Lift1.60x
Code Quality20.0%
MJ
Manoj Jahgirdar
Commits42
AI Usage98.0%
Productivity Lift1.50x
Code Quality90.0%
MS
Mayank Sachan
Commits17
AI Usage32.0%
Productivity Lift1.40x
Code Quality20.0%
AP
Abhishek Paul
Commits27
AI Usage42.0%
Productivity Lift1.37x
Code Quality20.0%
Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.
Cross-Organization Network
Shared Repositories
41Activity
449 Commits37
54
91
52
10
29
107
56
3
1
4
5
LessMore
Your Network
44 Peopleabpaul1993
Memberajaypvictor
Memberalbee-jhoney
Memberamitmangalvedkar
MemberAmulyam24
Memberayappanec
MemberBhagyashreek8
Membercvishal
Memberdeepesh-bhakar
MemberWhy these metrics matter for engineering managers
Faster delivery
1.4x lift → predictable roadmaps
Safer velocity
93% quality → lower rollback risk
Equitable gains
AI less dependency on heroes
Governance
Depth monitoring audit-ready
