Exceeds

MARCH 2026

korea.ac.kr Engineering AI Productivity Report

A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the korea.ac.kr engineering team.

See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.

The korea.ac.kr engineering team reports 78.4% AI adoption, 1.00× productivity lift, and 58.9% code quality across recent work.

These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.

What this report measures

We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.

How to interpret these metrics

Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.

AI Adoption Rate

HIGH

78.4%

AI assistance is present in 78.4% of recent commits for korea.ac.kr.

AI Productivity Lift

LOW

1.00×

AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 0% lift in throughput.

AI Code Quality

LOW

58.9%

Review insights show 58.9% overall code health on AI-supported changes.

How is the korea.ac.kr team performing with AI?

The korea.ac.kr engineering team reports 78.4% AI adoption, translating into 1.00× productivity lift while sustaining 58.9% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.

Manager Questions Answered

Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.

What's a good company AI adoption rate?

korea.ac.kr is at 78.4%. This is 34.6pp above the community median (43.8%)..

78.4%

Roughly in line43.8% Community Median

Spot squads sitting below the median and pair them with high-adoption champions to share workflows.

Does AI actually make developers faster?

korea.ac.kr operates at 1.00×. This is 0.13× below the community median (1.13×)..

1.00×

Roughly in line1.13× Community Median

Instrument reviewer assignment and AI summaries to trim the slowest merge steps and edge past the median.

How does AI affect code quality?

korea.ac.kr holds AI-assisted quality at 58.9%. This is 35.6pp above the community median (23.3%)..

58.9%

Roughly in line23.3% Community Median

Invest in AI-specific test checklists and shadow reviews to keep quality slightly ahead of peers.

How evenly is AI use distributed across our team?

45.1% of AI commits come from the most active contributors.

45.1%

Pair top AI practitioners with adjacent squads and capture their prompts/playbooks for reuse.

How can I prove AI ROI to executives?

korea.ac.kr has a solid ROI signal with room to strengthen either adoption, lift, or quality before presenting to executives.

Document case studies where AI accelerates delivery while maintaining quality, and expand playbooks across teams.

See how your full organization compares

Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.

Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.

How Your Company Ranks

See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.

AI Adoption

% of commits with AI assistance

Companies in this quartile:

QU

quantstack.net

(87.6%)

ST

student.su

(87.6%)

DG

dglover.co

(21.5%)

MO

monade.li

(21.5%)

Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.

Productivity Lift

Cycle-time improvement vs baseline

Companies in this quartile:

CU

cumps.be

(1.01×)

GR

gracicot.com

(1.01×)

.I

.ieselrincon.es

(1.00×)

RO

rockstarwizard.ninja

(1.00×)

Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.

Code Quality

Post-merge defect rate

Companies in this quartile:

KO

konghq.com

(795.0%)

IN

inngest.com

(701.7%)

GZ

gzgz.dev

(20.0%)

GW

gwu.edu

(20.0%)

Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.

Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).

Top contributors

Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.

SE

seo-yeonkang

Commits42
AI Usage100.0%
Productivity Lift2.00x
Code Quality82.0%
MI

minjae196

Commits22
AI Usage98.0%
Productivity Lift1.60x
Code Quality20.0%
KU

kukudas21atKU

Commits23
AI Usage99.3%
Productivity Lift1.52x
Code Quality62.8%
SE

SehunLee0

Commits17
AI Usage96.0%
Productivity Lift1.44x
Code Quality20.0%
HO

Hakjoo Oh

Commits58
AI Usage58.0%
Productivity Lift1.43x
Code Quality20.0%

Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.

Cross-Organization Network

Shared Repositories

12

Yeri-Nam

AIML-K/aiml-k.github.io

Junhee-Park0

KU-BIG/KUBIG_2024_FALL

KU-BIG/KUBIG_2025_SPRING

+1 more

kwang-min-ki

KU-BIG/KUBIG_2025_SPRING

KU-BIG/KUBIG_2025_FALL

kukudas21atKU

KU-BIG/KUBIG_2025_SPRING

KU-BIG/KUBIG_2025_FALL

seo-yeonkang

KU-BIG/KUBIG_2025_SPRING

hakjoooh

kupl/kupl.github.io

Activity

314 Commits

Your Network

26 People
minjae196
Member
The-Numb3
Member
MoonSunKyung
Member
jungchanghae
Member
cjsgkanwjr15
Member
hakjoooh
Member
Haeune-Jeon
Member
Junhee-Park0
Member
jhnaldo
Member

Why these metrics matter for engineering managers

Faster delivery

1.4x lift → predictable roadmaps

Safer velocity

93% quality → lower rollback risk

Equitable gains

AI less dependency on heroes

Governance

Depth monitoring audit-ready

ExceedsExceeds AI

Turns these insights into daily coaching and automatic alerts, helping managers balance speed with sustainability.

See the truth of AI impact

Adoption + lift + quality in one view

Learn more

Know where to act first

Repo and role level "lift potential"

Learn more

Prove ROI

Export executive snapshots and benchmarks

Learn more