MARCH 2026
A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the law.harvard.edu engineering team.
See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.
The law.harvard.edu engineering team reports 86.5% AI adoption, 1.34× productivity lift, and 58.4% code quality across recent work.
These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.
We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.
Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.
AI Adoption Rate
86.5%
AI assistance is present in 86.5% of recent commits for law.harvard.edu.
AI Productivity Lift
1.34×
AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 34% lift in throughput.
AI Code Quality
58.4%
Review insights show 58.4% overall code health on AI-supported changes.
The law.harvard.edu engineering team reports 86.5% AI adoption, translating into 1.34× productivity lift while sustaining 58.4% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.
Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.
What's a good company AI adoption rate?
law.harvard.edu is at 86.5%. This is 42.9pp above the community median (43.7%)..
86.5%
Spot squads sitting below the median and pair them with high-adoption champions to share workflows.
Does AI actually make developers faster?
law.harvard.edu operates at 1.34×. This is 0.21× above the community median (1.13×)..
1.34×
Instrument reviewer assignment and AI summaries to trim the slowest merge steps and edge past the median.
How does AI affect code quality?
law.harvard.edu holds AI-assisted quality at 58.4%. This is 35.2pp above the community median (23.2%)..
58.4%
Invest in AI-specific test checklists and shadow reviews to keep quality slightly ahead of peers.
How evenly is AI use distributed across our team?
AI impact is concentrated—70.8% of AI commits come from a few experts, raising enablement risk.
70.8%
Run prompt-sharing sessions, codify AI review checklists, and incentivize broad participation.
How can I prove AI ROI to executives?
law.harvard.edu has a solid ROI signal with room to strengthen either adoption, lift, or quality before presenting to executives.
—
Document case studies where AI accelerates delivery while maintaining quality, and expand playbooks across teams.
Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.
Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.
See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.
% of commits with AI assistance
?
cancun.tecnm.mx
(87.3%)
momentohq.com
(87.3%)
ub.edu
(21.2%)
rossabaker.com
(21.2%)
Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.
Cycle-time improvement vs baseline
?
inngest.com
(4.82×)
u.nus.edu
(2.87×)
acad.pucrs.br
(1.12×)
mcornholio.ru
(1.12×)
Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.
Post-merge defect rate
?
inngest.com
(701.7%)
idesie.com
(649.2%)
gzgz.dev
(20.0%)
gwu.edu
(20.0%)
Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.
Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).
Top contributors
Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.
Contributor
Commits
AI Usage
Productivity Lift
Code Quality
Matteo Cargnelutti
Clare Stanton
Kristi Mukk
Harvard LIL
Rebecca Cremona
Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.
harvard-lil/website-static
Faster delivery
1.4x lift → predictable roadmaps
Safer velocity
93% quality → lower rollback risk
Equitable gains
AI less dependency on heroes
Governance
Depth monitoring audit-ready
Exceeds AITurns these insights into daily coaching and automatic alerts, helping managers balance speed with sustainability.