Exceeds

MARCH 2026

live.dk Engineering AI Productivity Report

A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the live.dk engineering team.

See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.

The live.dk engineering team reports 55.6% AI adoption, 1.08× productivity lift, and 15.3% code quality across recent work.

These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.

What this report measures

We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.

How to interpret these metrics

Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.

AI Adoption Rate

MODERATE

55.6%

AI assistance is present in 55.6% of recent commits for live.dk.

AI Productivity Lift

LOW

1.08×

AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 8% lift in throughput.

AI Code Quality

LOW

15.3%

Review insights show 15.3% overall code health on AI-supported changes.

How is the live.dk team performing with AI?

The live.dk engineering team reports 55.6% AI adoption, translating into 1.08× productivity lift while sustaining 15.3% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.

Manager Questions Answered

Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.

What's a good company AI adoption rate?

live.dk is at 55.6%. This is 11.9pp above the community median (43.7%)..

55.6%

Roughly in line43.7% Community Median

Spot squads sitting below the median and pair them with high-adoption champions to share workflows.

Does AI actually make developers faster?

live.dk operates at 1.08×. This is 0.05× below the community median (1.13×)..

1.08×

Roughly in line1.13× Community Median

Instrument reviewer assignment and AI summaries to trim the slowest merge steps and edge past the median.

How does AI affect code quality?

live.dk holds AI-assisted quality at 15.3%. This is 7.9pp below the community median (23.3%)..

15.3%

↓7.9pp below23.3% Community Median

Add structured AI code review rubrics and require human sign-off for critical surfaces.

How evenly is AI use distributed across our team?

AI impact is concentrated—70.3% of AI commits come from a few experts, raising enablement risk.

70.3%

Run prompt-sharing sessions, codify AI review checklists, and incentivize broad participation.

How can I prove AI ROI to executives?

To prove ROI, live.dk needs steadier adoption, measurable lift, and consistent quality. The ingredients are forming but not yet executive-grade.

Start with a lighthouse project, measure cycle improvements end-to-end, and harden quality guardrails.

See how your full organization compares

Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.

Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.

How Your Company Ranks

See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.

AI Adoption

% of commits with AI assistance

Companies in this quartile:

DI

dimagi.com

(87.5%)

PO

postgresql.org

(87.5%)

BL

bloq.com

(21.4%)

DA

daimond113.com

(21.4%)

Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.

Productivity Lift

Cycle-time improvement vs baseline

Companies in this quartile:

AC

acad.pucrs.br

(1.12×)

MC

mcornholio.ru

(1.12×)

QU

querifylabs.com

(1.01×)

HR

hrvy.uk

(1.01×)

Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.

Code Quality

Post-merge defect rate

Companies in this quartile:

GZ

gzgz.dev

(20.0%)

GW

gwu.edu

(20.0%)

DR

draad.nl

(-82634.9%)

IN

inria.fr

(-2424.6%)

Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.

Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).

Top contributors

Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.

M4

m4cfly

Commits11
AI Usage42.0%
Productivity Lift1.80x
Code Quality20.0%
JE

Jeanette93Cph

Commits16
AI Usage68.0%
Productivity Lift1.40x
Code Quality20.0%
AN

andreas14101

Commits3
AI Usage20.0%
Productivity Lift1.33x
Code Quality20.0%
ZP

zPaddyz

Commits7
AI Usage28.0%
Productivity Lift1.20x
Code Quality20.0%
MI

MissClassyPineapple

Commits15
AI Usage36.0%
Productivity Lift1.11x
Code Quality20.0%

Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.

Cross-Organization Network

Shared Repositories

19

dksander

microsoft/ALAppExtensions

mortbopet

llvm/circt

hilleer

justjavac/deno-docs

Gizmooa

Energinet-DataHub/opengeh-python-packages

Dra3e

No repositories listed

niller-g

rust-lang/rust-analyzer

Activity

135 Commits

Your Network

21 People
MissClassyPineapple
Member
DanielKroner
Member
SKD21
Member
EdentheIda
Member
Dra3e
Member
andreas14101
Member
chrb22
Member
Willshaper
Member
Casper-Olsen
Member

Why these metrics matter for engineering managers

Faster delivery

1.4x lift → predictable roadmaps

Safer velocity

93% quality → lower rollback risk

Equitable gains

AI less dependency on heroes

Governance

Depth monitoring audit-ready

ExceedsExceeds AI

Turns these insights into daily coaching and automatic alerts, helping managers balance speed with sustainability.

See the truth of AI impact

Adoption + lift + quality in one view

Learn more

Know where to act first

Repo and role level "lift potential"

Learn more

Prove ROI

Export executive snapshots and benchmarks

Learn more