Exceeds

MARCH 2026

reachdigitalhealth.org Engineering AI Productivity Report

A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the reachdigitalhealth.org engineering team.

See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.

The reachdigitalhealth.org engineering team reports 90.8% AI adoption, 1.91× productivity lift, and 51.3% code quality across recent work.

These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.

What this report measures

We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.

How to interpret these metrics

Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.

AI Adoption Rate

HIGH

90.8%

AI assistance is present in 90.8% of recent commits for reachdigitalhealth.org.

AI Productivity Lift

HIGH

1.91×

AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 91% lift in throughput.

AI Code Quality

LOW

51.3%

Review insights show 51.3% overall code health on AI-supported changes.

How is the reachdigitalhealth.org team performing with AI?

The reachdigitalhealth.org engineering team reports 90.8% AI adoption, translating into 1.91× productivity lift while sustaining 51.3% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.

Manager Questions Answered

Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.

What's a good company AI adoption rate?

reachdigitalhealth.org is at 90.8%. This is 47.0pp above the community median (43.7%)..

90.8%

↑47.0pp above43.7% Community Median

Keep codifying prompts and monitoring adoption so the lead over peers is sustainable.

Does AI actually make developers faster?

reachdigitalhealth.org operates at 1.91×. This is 0.77× above the community median (1.13×)..

1.91×

↑0.77× above1.13× Community Median

Double down on automation around QA and release prep to compound the gains already in flight.

How does AI affect code quality?

reachdigitalhealth.org holds AI-assisted quality at 51.3%. This is 28.0pp above the community median (23.3%)..

51.3%

Roughly in line23.3% Community Median

Invest in AI-specific test checklists and shadow reviews to keep quality slightly ahead of peers.

How evenly is AI use distributed across our team?

AI impact is concentrated—99.9% of AI commits come from a few experts, raising enablement risk.

99.9%

Run prompt-sharing sessions, codify AI review checklists, and incentivize broad participation.

How can I prove AI ROI to executives?

reachdigitalhealth.org combines strong adoption, lift, and quality control—making the ROI story executive-ready.

Link these metrics to deployment frequency and incident cost to convert engineering wins into business KPIs.

See how your full organization compares

Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.

Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.

How Your Company Ranks

See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.

AI Adoption

% of commits with AI assistance

Companies in this quartile:

ID

idesie.com

(2904.2%)

IN

inngest.com

(1429.6%)

FM

fmease.dev

(87.5%)

DI

dimagi.com

(87.5%)

Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.

Productivity Lift

Cycle-time improvement vs baseline

Companies in this quartile:

IN

inngest.com

(4.82×)

U.

u.nus.edu

(2.87×)

AC

acad.pucrs.br

(1.12×)

MC

mcornholio.ru

(1.12×)

Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.

Code Quality

Post-merge defect rate

Companies in this quartile:

IN

inngest.com

(701.7%)

ID

idesie.com

(649.2%)

GZ

gzgz.dev

(20.0%)

GW

gwu.edu

(20.0%)

Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.

Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).

Top contributors

Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.

FB

Fritz Brand

Commits76
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift2.00x
Code Quality20.0%
GV

Gerrit Vermeulen

Commits156
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift1.89x
Code Quality100.0%
RG

Rudi Giesler

Commits27
AI Usage72.0%
Productivity Lift1.14x
Code Quality20.0%
JT

Jeremy Thurgood

Commits1
AI Usage20.0%
Productivity Lift1.04x
Code Quality20.0%

Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.

Cross-Organization Network

Shared Repositories

1

rudigiesler

praekeltfoundation/contentrepo

jerith

praekeltfoundation/contentrepo

fritzbrand

praekeltfoundation/contentrepo

HawkiesZA

praekeltfoundation/contentrepo

Activity

184 Commits

Your Network

4 People
fritzbrand
Member
HawkiesZA
Member
jerith
Member
rudigiesler
Member

Why these metrics matter for engineering managers

Faster delivery

1.4x lift → predictable roadmaps

Safer velocity

93% quality → lower rollback risk

Equitable gains

AI less dependency on heroes

Governance

Depth monitoring audit-ready

ExceedsExceeds AI

Turns these insights into daily coaching and automatic alerts, helping managers balance speed with sustainability.

See the truth of AI impact

Adoption + lift + quality in one view

Learn more

Know where to act first

Repo and role level "lift potential"

Learn more

Prove ROI

Export executive snapshots and benchmarks

Learn more