Exceeds

MARCH 2026

reactos.org Engineering AI Productivity Report

A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the reactos.org engineering team.

See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.

The reactos.org engineering team reports 85.1% AI adoption, 1.26× productivity lift, and 18.7% code quality across recent work.

These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.

What this report measures

We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.

How to interpret these metrics

Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.

AI Adoption Rate

HIGH

85.1%

AI assistance is present in 85.1% of recent commits for reactos.org.

AI Productivity Lift

MODERATE

1.26×

AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 26% lift in throughput.

AI Code Quality

LOW

18.7%

Review insights show 18.7% overall code health on AI-supported changes.

How is the reactos.org team performing with AI?

The reactos.org engineering team reports 85.1% AI adoption, translating into 1.26× productivity lift while sustaining 18.7% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.

Manager Questions Answered

Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.

What's a good company AI adoption rate?

reactos.org is at 85.1%. This is 41.4pp above the community median (43.7%)..

85.1%

Roughly in line43.7% Community Median

Spot squads sitting below the median and pair them with high-adoption champions to share workflows.

Does AI actually make developers faster?

reactos.org operates at 1.26×. This is 0.13× above the community median (1.13×)..

1.26×

Roughly in line1.13× Community Median

Instrument reviewer assignment and AI summaries to trim the slowest merge steps and edge past the median.

How does AI affect code quality?

reactos.org holds AI-assisted quality at 18.7%. This is 4.6pp below the community median (23.2%)..

18.7%

↓4.6pp below23.2% Community Median

Add structured AI code review rubrics and require human sign-off for critical surfaces.

How evenly is AI use distributed across our team?

AI impact is concentrated—84.6% of AI commits come from a few experts, raising enablement risk.

84.6%

Run prompt-sharing sessions, codify AI review checklists, and incentivize broad participation.

How can I prove AI ROI to executives?

To prove ROI, reactos.org needs steadier adoption, measurable lift, and consistent quality. The ingredients are forming but not yet executive-grade.

Start with a lighthouse project, measure cycle improvements end-to-end, and harden quality guardrails.

See how your full organization compares

Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.

Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.

How Your Company Ranks

See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.

AI Adoption

% of commits with AI assistance

Companies in this quartile:

CA

cancun.tecnm.mx

(87.3%)

MO

momentohq.com

(87.3%)

UB

ub.edu

(21.2%)

RO

rossabaker.com

(21.2%)

Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.

Productivity Lift

Cycle-time improvement vs baseline

Companies in this quartile:

IN

inngest.com

(4.82×)

U.

u.nus.edu

(2.87×)

AC

acad.pucrs.br

(1.12×)

MC

mcornholio.ru

(1.12×)

Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.

Code Quality

Post-merge defect rate

Companies in this quartile:

GZ

gzgz.dev

(20.0%)

GW

gwu.edu

(20.0%)

DR

draad.nl

(-82634.9%)

IN

inria.fr

(-2424.6%)

Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.

Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).

Top contributors

Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.

HB

Hermès BÉLUSCA - MAÏTO

Commits218
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift1.86x
Code Quality20.0%
TK

Timo Kreuzer

Commits287
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift1.59x
Code Quality20.0%
EK

Eric Kohl

Commits173
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift1.37x
Code Quality20.0%
CJ

Carl J. Bialorucki

Commits20
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift1.15x
Code Quality20.0%
JM

Justin Miller

Commits29
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift1.08x
Code Quality20.0%

Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.

Cross-Organization Network

Shared Repositories

8

HBelusca

reactos/reactos

MicrosoftDocs/sdk-api

EricKohl

reactos/reactos

DarkFire01

reactos/reactos

tkreuzer

reactos/reactos

ColinFinck

mozilla/sccache

AmineKhaldi

No repositories listed

Activity

605 Commits

Your Network

14 People
AmineKhaldi
Member
cbialorucki
Member
ColinFinck
Member
EricKohl
Member
GeoB99
Member
HBelusca
Member
hpoussin
Member
JoachimHenze
Member
janderwald
Member

Why these metrics matter for engineering managers

Faster delivery

1.4x lift → predictable roadmaps

Safer velocity

93% quality → lower rollback risk

Equitable gains

AI less dependency on heroes

Governance

Depth monitoring audit-ready

ExceedsExceeds AI

Turns these insights into daily coaching and automatic alerts, helping managers balance speed with sustainability.

See the truth of AI impact

Adoption + lift + quality in one view

Learn more

Know where to act first

Repo and role level "lift potential"

Learn more

Prove ROI

Export executive snapshots and benchmarks

Learn more