Exceeds

MARCH 2026

zilliz.com Engineering AI Productivity Report

A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the zilliz.com engineering team.

See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.

The zilliz.com engineering team reports 78.0% AI adoption, 1.00× productivity lift, and 72.0% code quality across recent work.

These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.

What this report measures

We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.

How to interpret these metrics

Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.

AI Adoption Rate

HIGH

78.0%

AI assistance is present in 78.0% of recent commits for zilliz.com.

AI Productivity Lift

LOW

1.00×

AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 0% lift in throughput.

AI Code Quality

MODERATE

72.0%

Review insights show 72.0% overall code health on AI-supported changes.

How is the zilliz.com team performing with AI?

The zilliz.com engineering team reports 78.0% AI adoption, translating into 1.00× productivity lift while sustaining 72.0% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.

Manager Questions Answered

Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.

What's a good company AI adoption rate?

zilliz.com is at 78.0%. This is 34.3pp above the community median (43.7%)..

78.0%

Roughly in line43.7% Community Median

Spot squads sitting below the median and pair them with high-adoption champions to share workflows.

Does AI actually make developers faster?

zilliz.com operates at 1.00×. This is 0.13× below the community median (1.13×)..

1.00×

↓0.13× below1.13× Community Median

Pilot AI-assisted grooming, ticket triage, or incident retros to create visible productivity wins.

How does AI affect code quality?

zilliz.com holds AI-assisted quality at 72.0%. This is 48.8pp above the community median (23.2%)..

72.0%

Roughly in line23.2% Community Median

Invest in AI-specific test checklists and shadow reviews to keep quality slightly ahead of peers.

How evenly is AI use distributed across our team?

AI impact is concentrated—88.4% of AI commits come from a few experts, raising enablement risk.

88.4%

Run prompt-sharing sessions, codify AI review checklists, and incentivize broad participation.

How can I prove AI ROI to executives?

To prove ROI, zilliz.com needs steadier adoption, measurable lift, and consistent quality. The ingredients are forming but not yet executive-grade.

Start with a lighthouse project, measure cycle improvements end-to-end, and harden quality guardrails.

See how your full organization compares

Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.

Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.

How Your Company Ranks

See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.

AI Adoption

% of commits with AI assistance

Companies in this quartile:

CA

cancun.tecnm.mx

(87.3%)

MO

momentohq.com

(87.3%)

UB

ub.edu

(21.2%)

RO

rossabaker.com

(21.2%)

Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.

Productivity Lift

Cycle-time improvement vs baseline

Companies in this quartile:

RO

rockstarwizard.ninja

(1.00×)

.I

.ieselrincon.es

(1.00×)

DR

draad.nl

(-9.59×)

WG

wgu.edu

(-0.41×)

Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.

Code Quality

Post-merge defect rate

Companies in this quartile:

IN

inngest.com

(701.7%)

ID

idesie.com

(649.2%)

GZ

gzgz.dev

(20.0%)

GW

gwu.edu

(20.0%)

Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.

Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).

Top contributors

Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.

MI

MimoN

Commits10
AI Usage100.0%
Productivity Lift1.18x
Code Quality20.0%
MI

Milvus-doc-bot

Commits916
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift1.18x
Code Quality92.0%
AN

AnthonyTsu1984

Commits14
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift1.15x
Code Quality20.0%
TH

ThyeeZz

Commits16
AI Usage94.0%
Productivity Lift1.15x
Code Quality20.0%
SI

SimFG

Commits42
AI Usage92.0%
Productivity Lift1.14x
Code Quality20.0%

Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.

Cross-Organization Network

Shared Repositories

7

huanghaoyuanhhy

minio/minio-go

liyun95

milvus-io/web-content

Unknown contributor

milvus-io/web-content

wangting0128

milvus-io/milvus

mimoning

milvus-io/milvus

SimFG

milvus-io/milvus

Activity

1,369 Commits

Your Network

43 People
Milvus-doc-bot@zilliz.com
Member
wayblink
Member
SimFG
Member
xiaocai2333
Member
chasingegg
Member
zc277584121
Member
congqixia
Member
jiaoew1991
Member
huanghaoyuanhhy
Member

Why these metrics matter for engineering managers

Faster delivery

1.4x lift → predictable roadmaps

Safer velocity

93% quality → lower rollback risk

Equitable gains

AI less dependency on heroes

Governance

Depth monitoring audit-ready

ExceedsExceeds AI

Turns these insights into daily coaching and automatic alerts, helping managers balance speed with sustainability.

See the truth of AI impact

Adoption + lift + quality in one view

Learn more

Know where to act first

Repo and role level "lift potential"

Learn more

Prove ROI

Export executive snapshots and benchmarks

Learn more