
Zoe Butterworth developed and enhanced planning appeals workflows in the Planning-Inspectorate/appeal-planning-decision repository, focusing on robust data capture, user experience, and operational reliability. She engineered features such as hearing scheduling, CAS and LDC appeal flows, and notification systems, integrating backend logic with frontend presentation using JavaScript, Node.js, and React. Her work included API development, schema design, and configuration management, ensuring accurate data routing and maintainable codebases. Zoe addressed data integrity by updating authority contacts and refining validation, while also implementing feature flags for safer deployments. The depth of her contributions reflects a strong grasp of full stack development and testing.
February 2026 monthly summary for Planning-Inspectorate repos: appeal-planning-decision and appeals-back-office. Delivered end-to-end enhancements to the Lawful Development Certificate (LDC) workflow, integrated LDC data into the LPAQ submission API, clarified user-facing questions, and simplified configuration by removing legacy feature flags. These changes improved data capture, reduced user errors, and streamlined operational maintenance, contributing to faster case processing and clearer governance of planning decisions.
February 2026 monthly summary for Planning-Inspectorate repos: appeal-planning-decision and appeals-back-office. Delivered end-to-end enhancements to the Lawful Development Certificate (LDC) workflow, integrated LDC data into the LPAQ submission API, clarified user-facing questions, and simplified configuration by removing legacy feature flags. These changes improved data capture, reduced user errors, and streamlined operational maintenance, contributing to faster case processing and clearer governance of planning decisions.
January 2026: Key features delivered, major bugs fixed, and notable infrastructure work across three repos. Key features include conditional environmental services logic added to LPAQ, a revamped can-use-service flow with LDC handling and a new feature flag for the LDC form, and LDC process enhancements with authentication improvements and new data fields. Additional improvements include UI/UX polish around page titles and deadlines, and targeted seed data fixes to ensure production/test data accuracy. An infrastructure flag was introduced to control the LDC-appeal-form-v2 deployment across environments. These efforts reduce user friction, improve data integrity, enable safer staged rollouts, and support faster delivery of policy changes.
January 2026: Key features delivered, major bugs fixed, and notable infrastructure work across three repos. Key features include conditional environmental services logic added to LPAQ, a revamped can-use-service flow with LDC handling and a new feature flag for the LDC form, and LDC process enhancements with authentication improvements and new data fields. Additional improvements include UI/UX polish around page titles and deadlines, and targeted seed data fixes to ensure production/test data accuracy. An infrastructure flag was introduced to control the LDC-appeal-form-v2 deployment across environments. These efforts reduce user friction, improve data integrity, enable safer staged rollouts, and support faster delivery of policy changes.
December 2025: Across Planning-Inspectorate repos, delivered enhancements and fixes that improve data integrity, user experience, and communications in the planning appeals lifecycle. Key outcomes include S78-integrated adverts mapping for the appeals API, updated LPA and local planning department contact details to ensure reliable notifications, and clarified document upload guidance to reflect adverts-related evidence. A session redirect fix in the new appeal flow reduced login navigation issues for BYS users.
December 2025: Across Planning-Inspectorate repos, delivered enhancements and fixes that improve data integrity, user experience, and communications in the planning appeals lifecycle. Key outcomes include S78-integrated adverts mapping for the appeals API, updated LPA and local planning department contact details to ensure reliable notifications, and clarified document upload guidance to reflect adverts-related evidence. A session redirect fix in the new appeal flow reduced login navigation issues for BYS users.
November 2025 delivered a significant upgrade to notification and timetable capabilities across Planning-Inspectorate repos, delivering more accurate communications, streamlined user flows, and robust test coverage. Key work included extending the notifications system for CAS and general adverts, modernizing the timetable flow, and enhancing appeal submission with enhanced feedback and representations. Additionally, critical data accuracy improvements to LPA contact details and improvements to user experience reduced redirects and kept personal-list state in sync across services.
November 2025 delivered a significant upgrade to notification and timetable capabilities across Planning-Inspectorate repos, delivering more accurate communications, streamlined user flows, and robust test coverage. Key work included extending the notifications system for CAS and general adverts, modernizing the timetable flow, and enhancing appeal submission with enhanced feedback and representations. Additionally, critical data accuracy improvements to LPA contact details and improvements to user experience reduced redirects and kept personal-list state in sync across services.
October 2025 was focused on data accuracy improvements in the planning appeal workflow. Implemented a critical data fix by correcting LPA contact emails in lpa-list.csv to ensure planning appeal communications reach the correct Local Planning Authorities (Cotswold, Nottingham City Council, and Rushcliffe). Changes were deployed in the Planning-Inspectorate/appeal-planning-decision repository and validated in the API/data layer. This fix reduced delivery risk for key stakeholder communications and improved overall data integrity.
October 2025 was focused on data accuracy improvements in the planning appeal workflow. Implemented a critical data fix by correcting LPA contact emails in lpa-list.csv to ensure planning appeal communications reach the correct Local Planning Authorities (Cotswold, Nottingham City Council, and Rushcliffe). Changes were deployed in the Planning-Inspectorate/appeal-planning-decision repository and validated in the API/data layer. This fix reduced delivery risk for key stakeholder communications and improved overall data integrity.
Month: 2025-09 – Consolidated feature delivery for Planning-Inspectorate/appeal-planning-decision with a focus on CAS labeling accuracy, enhanced questionnaire flows, and expanded LPAQ scopes. The work improves data capture, compliance and decision quality for planning appeals.
Month: 2025-09 – Consolidated feature delivery for Planning-Inspectorate/appeal-planning-decision with a focus on CAS labeling accuracy, enhanced questionnaire flows, and expanded LPAQ scopes. The work improves data capture, compliance and decision quality for planning appeals.
2025-08 monthly summary for Planning-Inspectorate/appeal-planning-decision focused on delivering CAS-aware advertisement appeals enhancements, distinct CAS processing paths, and expanded test coverage, with a targeted data-quality fix to improve input accuracy. The work emphasizes business value from improved data capture, routing accuracy, and maintainable/testable architectures.
2025-08 monthly summary for Planning-Inspectorate/appeal-planning-decision focused on delivering CAS-aware advertisement appeals enhancements, distinct CAS processing paths, and expanded test coverage, with a targeted data-quality fix to improve input accuracy. The work emphasizes business value from improved data capture, routing accuracy, and maintainable/testable architectures.
July 2025: Consolidated delivery across Planning-Inspectorate repositories focused on authentication resilience, extended appeal case handling, and data-model alignment. Key changes include non-breaking dependency rename, enhanced error handling and redirect stability for authentication, S20 support in document rows, and the introduction of ZA/ZP appeal case types through the data model update. These changes improve user experience, enable broader appeal types, and reduce maintenance friction by aligning package imports.
July 2025: Consolidated delivery across Planning-Inspectorate repositories focused on authentication resilience, extended appeal case handling, and data-model alignment. Key changes include non-breaking dependency rename, enhanced error handling and redirect stability for authentication, S20 support in document rows, and the introduction of ZA/ZP appeal case types through the data model update. These changes improve user experience, enable broader appeal types, and reduce maintenance friction by aligning package imports.
In June 2025, delivered targeted UI enhancements for the appeal-planning-decision repository to improve clarity, consistency, and maintainability in the appeals workflow. Focused on enhancements to the Appellant view and messaging, plus a UI wording fix to remove ambiguity in the planning type question.
In June 2025, delivered targeted UI enhancements for the appeal-planning-decision repository to improve clarity, consistency, and maintainability in the appeals workflow. Focused on enhancements to the Appellant view and messaging, plus a UI wording fix to remove ambiguity in the planning type question.
May 2025 monthly summary for Planning-Inspectorate/appeal-planning-decision: Delivered a new feature to display hearing dates and times for Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) within the appeal planning decision workflow. The feature uses formatHearings and is integrated into the selected appeal view with venue details or a confirmation note, enabling LPAs to plan and track hearings more effectively. This work aligns with the A2-1175 ticket and is implemented in commit c2ab687f74fcb550ee811be113ef1244f30fc910. No major bugs were reported in this scope. Impact: improved planning accuracy and scheduling efficiency for LPAs, reduced back-and-forth, and a stronger data surface for hearings. Technologies/skills demonstrated: frontend UI integration, data presentation using formatHearings, version control traceability, and alignment with cross-team requirements.
May 2025 monthly summary for Planning-Inspectorate/appeal-planning-decision: Delivered a new feature to display hearing dates and times for Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) within the appeal planning decision workflow. The feature uses formatHearings and is integrated into the selected appeal view with venue details or a confirmation note, enabling LPAs to plan and track hearings more effectively. This work aligns with the A2-1175 ticket and is implemented in commit c2ab687f74fcb550ee811be113ef1244f30fc910. No major bugs were reported in this scope. Impact: improved planning accuracy and scheduling efficiency for LPAs, reduced back-and-forth, and a stronger data surface for hearings. Technologies/skills demonstrated: frontend UI integration, data presentation using formatHearings, version control traceability, and alignment with cross-team requirements.

Overview of all repositories you've contributed to across your timeline