Exceeds

MARCH 2026

vates.tech Engineering AI Productivity Report

A focused summary of AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for the vates.tech engineering team.

See how AI-active teams rank this week on the Exceeds Leaderboards.

The vates.tech engineering team reports 84.0% AI adoption, 1.52× productivity lift, and 20.0% code quality across recent work.

These metrics track how AI integrates into delivery pipelines, how throughput changes when assistance is used, and the health of AI-supported code review outcomes.

What this report measures

We analyze commits and diffs to estimate AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality for your engineering organization.

How to interpret these metrics

Use these signals to understand how AI assistance fits into day-to-day development, where enablement efforts drive throughput, and how review practices keep quality steady.

AI Adoption Rate

HIGH

84.0%

AI assistance is present in 84.0% of recent commits for vates.tech.

AI Productivity Lift

HIGH

1.52×

AI-enabled workflows deliver an estimated 52% lift in throughput.

AI Code Quality

LOW

20.0%

Review insights show 20.0% overall code health on AI-supported changes.

How is the vates.tech team performing with AI?

The vates.tech engineering team reports 84.0% AI adoption, translating into 1.52× productivity lift while sustaining 20.0% code quality. These outcomes suggest AI-supported reviews are embedded in day-to-day delivery without trading off reliability.

Manager Questions Answered

Real questions engineering leaders ask about AI productivity, with live benchmarks and company-specific data.

What's a good company AI adoption rate?

vates.tech is at 84.0%. This is 40.4pp above the community median (43.7%)..

84.0%

Roughly in line43.7% Community Median

Spot squads sitting below the median and pair them with high-adoption champions to share workflows.

Does AI actually make developers faster?

vates.tech operates at 1.52×. This is 0.39× above the community median (1.13×)..

1.52×

↑0.39× above1.13× Community Median

Double down on automation around QA and release prep to compound the gains already in flight.

How does AI affect code quality?

vates.tech holds AI-assisted quality at 20.0%. This is 3.2pp below the community median (23.2%)..

20.0%

Roughly in line23.2% Community Median

Invest in AI-specific test checklists and shadow reviews to keep quality slightly ahead of peers.

How evenly is AI use distributed across our team?

55.7% of AI commits come from the most active contributors.

55.7%

Pair top AI practitioners with adjacent squads and capture their prompts/playbooks for reuse.

How can I prove AI ROI to executives?

vates.tech has a solid ROI signal with room to strengthen either adoption, lift, or quality before presenting to executives.

Document case studies where AI accelerates delivery while maintaining quality, and expand playbooks across teams.

See how your full organization compares

Unlock personalized insights across all your repositories, teams, and contributors.

Securely connect Exceeds with your codebase to get commit-level insights on AI adoption and performance.

How Your Company Ranks

See how top engineering organizations compare across AI adoption, productivity lift, and code quality.

AI Adoption

% of commits with AI assistance

Companies in this quartile:

CA

cancun.tecnm.mx

(87.3%)

MO

momentohq.com

(87.3%)

UB

ub.edu

(21.2%)

RO

rossabaker.com

(21.2%)

Top 25% of teams adopt AI in 65-75% of their commits.

Productivity Lift

Cycle-time improvement vs baseline

Companies in this quartile:

IN

inngest.com

(4.82×)

U.

u.nus.edu

(2.87×)

AC

acad.pucrs.br

(1.12×)

MC

mcornholio.ru

(1.12×)

Top performers sustain 1.5× cycle-time improvements over six months when embedding AI into workflows.

Code Quality

Post-merge defect rate

Companies in this quartile:

GZ

gzgz.dev

(20.0%)

GW

gwu.edu

(20.0%)

GZ

gzgz.dev

(20.0%)

GW

gwu.edu

(20.0%)

Top 25% maintain quality above 92% while expanding AI usage, pairing automation with rigorous guardrails.

Rankings based on aggregated Exceeds AI dataset of 1.2M commits across open-source and enterprise engineering teams (Q4 2025).

Top contributors

Top contributors combine high AI adoption and quality output. Encourage internal sharing of best practices.

YD

Yann Dirson

Commits107
AI Usage84.6%
Productivity Lift1.99x
Code Quality20.0%
AS

Andrii Sultanov

Commits84
AI Usage91.7%
Productivity Lift1.82x
Code Quality20.0%
TM

Thomas Moraine

Commits57
AI Usage87.4%
Productivity Lift1.65x
Code Quality20.0%
GL

Gaëtan Lehmann

Commits40
AI Usage91.3%
Productivity Lift1.48x
Code Quality20.0%
PR

Pau Ruiz Safont

Commits31
AI Usage76.1%
Productivity Lift1.35x
Code Quality20.0%

Encourage knowledge transfer from top AI users to others through internal mentoring or recorded "AI coding walkthroughs." Balanced adoption across the team typically improves overall performance by 12-15%.

Cross-Organization Network

Shared Repositories

10

olivierlambert

vatesfr/xen-orchestra

thomas-dkmt

xcp-ng/xcp-ng-org

vatesfr/xen-orchestra

Nambrok

xcp-ng/xcp-ng-tests

xcp-ng/xcp-ng-org

b-Nollet

vatesfr/xen-orchestra

gthvn1

xapi-project/xen-api

xcp-ng/xcp-ng-org

+1 more

benjamreis

xcp-ng/xcp-ng-tests

Activity

387 Commits

Your Network

25 People
last-genius
Member
AnthoineB
Member
tperard
Member
b-Nollet
Member
benjamreis
Member
Nambrok
Member
bleader
Member
glehmann
Member
gthvn1
Member

Why these metrics matter for engineering managers

Faster delivery

1.4x lift → predictable roadmaps

Safer velocity

93% quality → lower rollback risk

Equitable gains

AI less dependency on heroes

Governance

Depth monitoring audit-ready

ExceedsExceeds AI

Turns these insights into daily coaching and automatic alerts, helping managers balance speed with sustainability.

See the truth of AI impact

Adoption + lift + quality in one view

Learn more

Know where to act first

Repo and role level "lift potential"

Learn more

Prove ROI

Export executive snapshots and benchmarks

Learn more